Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Saved Lives and Eased Burdens During COVID’s First Wave, New Study Shows

Small numbers have a big effect

The researchers conducted a systematic literature review of 44 papers from three separate databases that used data from the first six months of the pandemic. They concentrated on this timeframe because, by fall 2020, the second wave had emerged and governments and individuals had changed their behaviours, having had time to adapt to the measures.

Peters and Farhadloo harmonized the various metrics used across the papers and divided the different kinds of measures into 10 categories. They then measured their effectiveness on case numbers, hospitalization and deaths over two, three or four, and more weeks after implementation.

Among other results, the researchers found that:

• Masks were associated with decreases in cases and deaths.
• Closing schools and businesses resulted in lower per capita deaths, but those effects decreased after four weeks.
• Restaurant/bar closures and travel restrictions corresponded to decreases in mortality after four weeks.
• Shelter-in-placeorders (SIPOs) resulted in fewer cases but only after a delay of two weeks.
• SIPOs and mask wearing were associated with reducing the healthcare burden.
• Policy stringency, SIPOs, mask wearing, limited gatherings and school closures were associated with reduced mortality rates and slower case number growth rates.

“We found that wearing masks led to an estimated reduction of about 2.76 cases per 100,000 people and 0.19 in mortality. These effects sound small but are statistically significant,” Peters explains.

“When you scale these numbers up to the millions, these measures could be preventing hundreds or thousands of deaths.”

Farhadloo adds that understanding the usefulness of these measures can help counter the growth of misinformation online.

“We started this project in 2022, while COVID health measures were still in place. At that time, some people were citing research saying that these measures were not effective. But the scientific research articles they were referring to were flawed.

“We wanted to respond to the existing misinformation and disinformation that was being disseminated on social media by raising awareness about it.”

Peters believes that the paper, which looks at effectiveness over a longer time span than most previous studies, can inform policy makers in the future.

“If and when another pandemic occurs, we should be more prepared. We should know which policies are most effective at mitigating not only mortality but cases and hospitalizations as well.”

Read the cited paper: “The Effects of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis”